Coffee review

Ethiopian Coffee Bean Story Coffee taboo Historical characteristics Flavor description treatment

Published: 2024-11-17 Author: World Gafei
Last Updated: 2024/11/17, According to the flavor description of Ethiopian coffee beans, Getachew Mengistie, director of the Ethiopian Bureau of intellectual property, bluntly pointed out that farmers sell raw beans for $1.45 per pound, while Starbucks sells for $26 per pound in the United States, 18 times the price difference between the two places. The reason is that Ethiopia does not know to use intellectual property rights to create value for farmers, as long as it produces Ethiopian high-quality products.

Introduction to the flavor description of Ethiopian coffee beans

Getachew Mengistie, director of Ethiopia's Bureau of intellectual property, bluntly pointed out that farmers sell raw beans for $1.45 a pound, while Starbucks sells for $26 a pound in the United States, 18 times the price difference between the two places. The reason is that Ethiopia does not know how to use intellectual property rights to create value for farmers. As long as it has the name of Ethiopian boutique beans, it can be marketed in the United States at three times the price of ordinary commercial beans. You know, investing in baking, packaging and marketing equipment through downstream channels in the United States alone cannot create such a huge added value, because most of the value comes from the coffee producing area (if Starbucks is not branded as "Sidamo", you can't sell it at such a high price. He stressed: "Ethiopia is the birthplace of coffee, and the famous producing areas of course have huge marketing value, but they are ignored by farmers. As a result, excess profits are finally earned by countries that know how to use the prestige of the place of origin to create value. It took no effort to earn it!

Ethiopia finally woke up and decided to learn from the skills of Western developed countries in mastering brands and creating value for the benefit of hard-working farmers, so in March 2005, Ethiopia applied to the United States Patent and Trademark Administration for the trademark rights of three famous places of origin, namely, Sidamo, Yega Xuefei and Harald. In the future, when American manufacturers sell high-quality coffee in these three places, they must be authorized by Ethiopia before they can put up the name of origin, so that hard-working farmers can get a more reasonable reward.

Oxfam estimates that once Ethiopia acquires the trademark rights of these three places of origin, it will increase Ethiopia's revenue by US $88 million a year. However, Starbucks challenged the US Trademark Office because Starbucks first applied for Sidamo as a trademark as early as two ○○ four years ago, and although the case is still under review, the first applicant has the upper hand. The Ethiopian ambassador to the United States negotiated with Starbucks and received a response: "Please talk to our lawyer directly." However, in ○○ six years, the United States Trademark Office approved Ethiopia to own the trademark "Yega Xuefei", while the names of the two producing areas, Sidamo and Harald, are still under consideration. Starbucks hired a large team of lawyers to step up defense firepower in an attempt to prevent Ethiopia from taking control of trademarks in two other producing areas.

In November 2006, the newly appointed senior deputy general manager of Starbucks du Hei (Dub Hay, the so-called "big shot" who visited Yunnan, China last year) even published a film on "You Tube", openly calling out to Ethiopia, criticizing the trademark application of place names as illegal, and suggesting that the authorities of the country should change to the origin certification system, such as the Blue Mountains of Jamaica and Kona Coffee of Hawaii. There is also protection for consumers. The film attracted tens of thousands of views in a month, but angered the US media and humanitarian groups, saying that Starbucks was ugly. Roberta Hutton, a lawyer representing Ethiopia, said: "Duhei is talking nonsense. Ethiopia's move is aimed at protecting valuable goods and consolidating due intellectual property rights." Ethiopia is just adopting Starbucks' trademark protection strategy. Why do others have to make it difficult for others to do so? "

0