Nav: Home > Coffee Knowledge >

Grading of raw coffee beans

Published: 2024-11-11 Author: World Gafei

Last Updated: 2024/11/11, At present, there are three main rating criteria for raw coffee beans, and different countries adopt different rating methods according to their own production conditions and national conditions (not all coffee producing countries adopt the same method). Let's introduce these three popular rating methods. One: the reason for the emergence of such a classification standard according to the altitude of the coffee producing area is mainly because of the high level.

At present, there are three main rating criteria for raw coffee beans, and different countries adopt different rating methods according to their own production conditions and national conditions (not all coffee producing countries adopt the same method). Let's introduce these three popular rating methods.

One: classification according to the altitude of the coffee producing area

The main reason for this classification standard is that the quality of coffee produced at high altitude is generally higher than that at low altitude, because high altitude and low temperature, slow coffee production is conducive to the accumulation of good substances. And the raw beans with high maturity have good expansibility when baking, which is beneficial to baking, and the quality is more stable. At present, the coffee producers using this classification standard are Central and South American countries such as Guatemala, Mexico, Honduras, El Salvador and so on. About 1000m, 800m, 600m Murray 800m and less than 600m.

Second, grading according to the screen.

The way of sieve grading is to grade according to the size of raw coffee beans. Raw beans are graded by determining the size of the beans through a holed iron plate sieve. The size of the hole in the screen is 1x64 inches (less than 0.4mm), so the size of the screen indicates that there are several 1x64 inches. For example, the size of screen 17 is 17x64 inches, which is about 6.75mm, so the larger the number of the screen, the bigger the particles of raw coffee beans. The reason for this grading is that beans with large grains sell better and are more likely to produce rich and varied flavors than small ones. But this is not to say that beans with large grains are of better quality than beans with small grains. Ethiopian coffee beans are generally narrow and small, but their taste is the most unforgettable and favorite, including Yunnan's small seed coffee. it is also highly appraised by the international market. Kenya is one of the most representative countries rated by sieve, along with Tanzania and Colombia (some countries use more than one classification, and the examples given here are representative, mainly in this way). Kenya's most advanced AA++ requires sieves larger than 18, that is, beans larger than 7.15 mm. Kenya beans are graded carefully, including AA++,AA+,AA,AB and so on. Colombia's classification is simpler, divided into Supremo (selected) and Excelso (upper) according to bean size. 80% of the raw beans of the selected grade need to use a sieve of more than 17, and 80% of the raw beans of the upper grade need a sieve of 14 and more than 16, and a maximum of 11% of the beans with sieve 16 are allowed to be mixed with 14 sieve beans. The screen mentioned above is for flat beans, round beans (Pea Berry) has its own set of screen size standards. Generally use the screen of 8Murray No. 12 to grade the round beans.

Third, grading according to the proportion of screen and defective beans.

Defective beans are an important factor that destroys the flavor of the final coffee. Therefore, defective beans should also be removed in the last step of raw bean processing. This has the problem of the number of defective beans, so according to the proportion of defective beans, supplemented by the size of the screen is also a way of classification. Due to the rise of boutique coffee, coffee producing countries pay more and more attention to the quality of coffee, and the control of defective beans is the most important way, so basically using the proportion of defective beans as a grading method or auxiliary basis is becoming more and more common. At present, the main representative countries that use defective bean proportion method are Jamaica, Brazil, Ethiopia and so on. Jamaica is based on the comprehensive rating criteria of producing area, altitude, screen, and defective bean ratio. For example, Jamaica Blue Mountain NO.1 refers to the blue mountain producing area, above 1700m above sea level, with a sieve No. 17 with 18gamble, and the top coffee beans with the most defective beans accounting for 2%. The proportion of defective beans is used as an important basis. Jamaica strictly controls the proportion of defective beans, and the proportion of defective beans in all grades is no more than 4%. Brazil is another special country. Brazil is the largest coffee producing country in the world. Because of its large output and many producing areas, the classification work is quite troublesome, and it is not suitable to adopt a single classification standard, so Brazil also uses a variety of classification methods at the same time. Defective bean proportion, sieve and cup evaluation tests are all used in the grading process of Brazilian coffee beans. Needless to say about the first two, the cup evaluation test is one of the characteristics of Brazilian coffee grading. The so-called cup evaluation test is to evaluate the aroma and taste of raw coffee beans by soaking them in hot water (about 90 degrees) after baking. It is mainly divided into six grades: Strictly Soft extremely mild, Soft mild, Softish slightly mild, Hard difficult, Rio light iodine taste, Rioy strong iodine flavor. The first three grades can be called mild, with a balanced sweet and sour coffee and a mild taste. The latter three taste slightly worse, especially the latter two are the worst. The reason for the iodine smell is that the soil near Rio de Janeiro has a strong iodine smell, and the coffee is dropped on the ground during harvest and is contaminated with the peculiar smell of the adsorbed soil. The above three are the popular coffee grading methods, but not all of them. For example, Ethiopia will take the handling of raw coffee beans as one of the grading criteria. In addition, there is a more and more widely used COE rating system. As coffee producing countries pay more and more attention to coffee quality and the enthusiasm of producers, the classification of raw coffee beans is not limited to the above three main ways. Only with more careful planting can we produce higher quality coffee and get a high rating in the grade evaluation, so the subdivision and strict control of coffee rating is undoubtedly a good thing for the improvement of coffee quality.

The grading system of each producing area:

African countries-Kenya kenya

PB: peaberry

AA Plus-plus

AA plus

AA: Screen 17 and 18

AB: screen 15 and 16

African countries-Ethiopia

300 grams of raw beans as the basis for calculation

1: 0-3 defects

2: 4-12

3: 13-25